Should Selection Also Screen for Employee Wellbeing?
Personnel selection has always focused on one question: who will perform best? A 2025 provocation article argues this singular focus is ethically and practically inadequate, and that employee wellbeing should be treated as an explicit criterion alongside performance in how organisations select people.
Psychology’s Questionable Research Fundamentals
Psychology's replication crisis has been blamed on researcher misconduct and poor statistics. A sweeping 2025 paper by twelve researchers argues the real problem runs far deeper: the theoretical and measurement foundations of quantitative psychology are themselves fundamentally flawed.
Neurobollocks: Nine Brain Myths You Should Stop Believing
Left-brain, right-brain profiles. Learning styles. The Mozart effect. The lizard brain. These ideas shape training programmes, coaching frameworks, and leadership development worldwide. A well-referenced 2021 practitioner article examines nine of the most popular brain-based claims and finds that most of them have no credible neuroscientific support whatsoever.
Personality Test Validity: Does the Stakes Level Matter?
Personality tests are widely used in hiring, with validity evidence drawn largely from low-stakes research settings. A 2025 meta-analysis finds that validity is consistently lower when the stakes are high and candidates have reason to present themselves strategically, raising questions about how well the published evidence base applies to real selection contexts.
The Many Facets of Leadership: What Personality Actually Predicts
Leadership research has long relied on broad personality traits. A 2026 meta-analysis of 203 datasets finds that the facets beneath those traits tell a considerably richer story, and that the personality profile that gets people chosen as leaders is often not the one that makes them effective.
Happiness Strategies: Are the Most Popular Ones Supported by Evidence?
Mindfulness, gratitude, and nature walks are among the most commonly recommended happiness strategies. A 2023 systematic review finds the evidence behind most of them is based on small, poorly designed studies, and the strength of the case is far weaker than their popularity implies.
Executive Coaching: What Does the Rigorous Evidence Show?
Executive coaching is widely used but its causal effectiveness has been difficult to establish. A 2023 meta-analysis restricted to randomised controlled trials only finds a moderate and significant effect, while identifying the coaching relationship as the primary driver of outcomes.
Leader Mindfulness: What the Evidence Shows
Does leader mindfulness matter? A meta-analysis of 54 samples and 9,400 leaders finds it is associated with better leader wellbeing, stronger relationships, and positive outcomes for followers, with mindfulness interventions showing particular promise for reducing leader stress.
Does CEO Pay Actually Drive Company Performance?
The case for large CEO bonuses rests on the assumption that they drive company performance. A 2023 systematic review of four decades of evidence finds that assumption is largely unsupported, and that nobody had thought to check it systematically until now.
Can Digital Data Reveal Your Personality?
Your digital footprint may reveal more about your personality than you realise. A 2024 meta-analysis of both human perception and machine learning studies finds meaningful but imperfect accuracy, with humans performing at least as well as algorithms on average.